4 posters
I don't like this photo
silverline- Posts : 453
Join date : 2011-03-09
Location : london uk
Humor : 8
- Post n°2
Re: I don't like this photo
oh not in good taste for an elegant charming lady....I don't like the way she is seated.....
Artful_Dodger- Posts : 1504
Join date : 2010-01-16
Location : Garden State
- Post n°3
Re: I don't like this photo
She's still sexy anyway she sits.
silverline- Posts : 453
Join date : 2011-03-09
Location : london uk
Humor : 8
- Post n°4
Re: I don't like this photo
Yes she is always sexy whatever she does she is sexy, but the pic is making her look cheap, which she isn't...
Artful_Dodger- Posts : 1504
Join date : 2010-01-16
Location : Garden State
- Post n°5
Re: I don't like this photo
Should I kill the photographer?
silverline- Posts : 453
Join date : 2011-03-09
Location : london uk
Humor : 8
- Post n°6
Re: I don't like this photo
noooooooo don't do that! Let him live his life.
Artful_Dodger- Posts : 1504
Join date : 2010-01-16
Location : Garden State
- Post n°7
Re: I don't like this photo
Okay.
Mario- Posts : 208
Join date : 2011-04-17
Humor : You know when your sitting in a chair and you lean back so you're on just 2 legs and you almost fall over and at the last second you catch yourself? I feel like that all the time.
- Post n°8
Re: I don't like this photo
cheap?
Are we talking naked skin in general or are we talking aesthetics of this shot? If it's the later I understand you have problems with it. Her exact position on that chair is hard to guess, it looks almost Yoga-like. Her upper body is pretty much leaned forward, makes her even smaller. The position of her right leg (left on pic) is unusual, the viewing angle is also no help for our brain. No I think it's interesting and I wish had been on location back then to see what the photographer told Jodie.
Are we talking naked skin in general or are we talking aesthetics of this shot? If it's the later I understand you have problems with it. Her exact position on that chair is hard to guess, it looks almost Yoga-like. Her upper body is pretty much leaned forward, makes her even smaller. The position of her right leg (left on pic) is unusual, the viewing angle is also no help for our brain. No I think it's interesting and I wish had been on location back then to see what the photographer told Jodie.
Artful_Dodger- Posts : 1504
Join date : 2010-01-16
Location : Garden State
- Post n°9
Re: I don't like this photo
She still looks good to me.
silverline- Posts : 453
Join date : 2011-03-09
Location : london uk
Humor : 8
- Post n°10
Re: I don't like this photo
Let me explain.... Jodie is always sexy and always looks good.
The photo may be well a professional photo, with its colours and angles. Even the position of her legs in itself is ok, an ordinary position, but the combination of that raincoat, her make-up, in that position, makes her look cheap. I just think the 3 things combined are not in good taste.
If she had been naked she would have looked much less cheap!
The raincoat is the cheap culprit!!! yes the raincoat should be removed...and please don't harm the photographer... I think he has done a good job.
The photo may be well a professional photo, with its colours and angles. Even the position of her legs in itself is ok, an ordinary position, but the combination of that raincoat, her make-up, in that position, makes her look cheap. I just think the 3 things combined are not in good taste.
If she had been naked she would have looked much less cheap!
The raincoat is the cheap culprit!!! yes the raincoat should be removed...and please don't harm the photographer... I think he has done a good job.
Artful_Dodger- Posts : 1504
Join date : 2010-01-16
Location : Garden State
- Post n°11
Re: I don't like this photo
Well, I don't know. But JF in the nude is just divine.
|
|